ISO 27001 vs SOC 2: What’s the Difference?

What is ISO 27001?

ISO 27001 is the internationally recognized standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continuously improving an Information Security Management System (ISMS). Developed jointly by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), it defines a structured, risk-based approach to managing information security.

The purpose of ISO 27001 is to help organizations identify risks that threaten the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets, then apply appropriate controls to reduce those risks. It provides a consistent framework that can be applied across industries and geographies, ensuring that security management is systematic rather than reactive.

At its core, ISO 27001 is not a one-time compliance exercise but a continuous cycle of improvement. The framework is designed around the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) model, which ensures that information security policies and procedures remain effective over time. This model drives organizations to regularly assess vulnerabilities, measure the success of implemented controls, and refine them based on evolving risks.

The Certification Process

Earning ISO 27001 certification involves a multi-stage process verified by an accredited third-party auditor. The main steps include defining the ISMS scope, conducting risk assessments, implementing security controls, and documenting processes. Once these elements are in place, the organization undergoes two external audits.

Stage 1 is a readiness assessment that verifies documentation and scope. Stage 2 is a more comprehensive review that tests whether the implemented controls are effective in practice. Once certified, the organization must complete annual surveillance audits and a recertification audit every three years.

The process ensures not only compliance with the ISO 27001 requirements but also a sustained commitment to managing and mitigating information security risks at the organizational level.

What is SOC 2?

SOC 2, short for “System and Organization Controls 2,” is an auditing framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). It evaluates how service organizations manage and protect customer data based on five Trust Services Criteria:

• Security
• Availability
• Processing integrity
• Confidentiality
• Privacy

SOC 2 applies most commonly to SaaS providers, cloud service companies, and other technology organizations that handle sensitive customer data.

While ISO 27001 sets the requirements for an ISMS, SOC 2 focuses on whether an organization’s existing controls effectively meet one or more of the Trust Services Criteria.

Instead of a certification, organizations receive an attestation report written by an independent auditor. This report provides assurance to customers and business partners that the company’s controls are appropriately designed and operating effectively.

SOC 2 Type I and Type II

There are two types of SOC 2 reports. A Type I report assesses the design of controls at a specific point in time. A Type II report evaluates how effectively those controls operate over a defined period, usually six to twelve months. The Type II report carries more weight because it demonstrates ongoing compliance rather than a single moment of conformity.

Organizations pursuing SOC 2 compliance must work with a licensed CPA firm, which conducts an audit based on the selected Trust Services Criteria. The auditor’s opinion is included in the final report, which clients and partners can review as part of their vendor risk management process.

Purpose and Market Recognition

SOC 2 has become the de facto standard for U.S. companies seeking to validate their security posture to clients. It is particularly relevant in business-to-business (B2B) environments where service providers must prove the reliability and integrity of their operations.

While ISO 27001 enjoys global recognition, SOC 2 is more prominent in North America and is often considered the preferred compliance framework for technology companies that serve enterprise clients in the region.

Mimecast’s solutions directly support SOC 2 objectives by securing communication systems, maintaining data availability, and providing transparent reporting that organizations can use as part of their evidence for auditors and customers.

Key Differences Between ISO 27001 and SOC 2

Although ISO 27001 and SOC 2 share many similarities, including their focus on protecting data and managing risk, they differ in scope, methodology, and deliverables.

Scope and Approach

The first major difference between ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 is scope. ISO 27001 covers the entire organization and focuses on the development and maintenance of a formal management system for information security. SOC 2, in contrast, evaluates specific systems or services and measures how well their controls meet the Trust Services Criteria.

ISO 27001 is prescriptive, requiring organizations to establish clear processes and documentation for security management. SOC 2 is more flexible, allowing companies to tailor their control environment based on which Trust Services Criteria they select. This adaptability makes SOC 2 especially suitable for service-based organizations that want to focus audits on specific products or customer environments.

Global vs. Regional Recognition

ISO 27001 holds global prestige. It is widely accepted across Europe, Asia, and other international markets where clients often require ISO certification as part of contractual obligations. SOC 2, on the other hand, is rooted in U.S. accounting standards and is best recognized in North America. Many international organizations choose ISO 27001 to appeal to global customers, while U.S. companies often pursue SOC 2 first to meet domestic expectations. 

Controls and Reporting

ISO 27001 mandates that organizations implement the 93 controls listed in Annex A of the 2022 version of the standard, or justify exclusions in their Statement of Applicability. These controls cover areas such as access management, cryptography, supplier security, and incident response. SOC 2 controls are not predefined; instead, they are developed by the organization in alignment with the relevant Trust Services Criteria and validated by an auditor during the examination.

Another distinction lies in the outcome. ISO 27001 produces a formal certificate issued by an accredited registrar, whereas SOC 2 results in an attestation report. The certificate demonstrates compliance with a globally recognized standard, while the report provides detailed auditor opinions that can be shared with clients during due diligence.

When to Choose ISO 27001

Organizations typically pursue ISO 27001 when they want to demonstrate a comprehensive, organization-wide commitment to information security management. The framework is suitable for businesses operating internationally or those subject to stringent data protection regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

Companies that benefit most from ISO 27001 certification include financial institutions, government contractors, healthcare providers, and enterprises managing sensitive intellectual property. The certification acts as evidence of due diligence and provides assurance to regulators, investors, and customers that information security is systematically managed and continuously improved.

ISO 27001 is also valuable for organizations seeking to align multiple compliance requirements under a unified management system. Because it covers governance, risk management, and operational controls, ISO 27001 can serve as a foundation for meeting other frameworks such as HIPAA, NIST CSF, and PCI DSS.

Mimecast’s capabilities support ISO 27001 compliance by strengthening the ISMS with continuous threat monitoring, automated data protection policies, and audit-ready reporting. Its technology aligns with Annex A requirements, particularly those related to email security, access control, and information transfer.

When to Choose SOC 2

SOC 2 is often the better starting point for service organizations, particularly those in software and technology sectors that handle customer data through cloud platforms. Many procurement teams in the United States request a SOC 2 report as part of their vendor evaluation process, making it essential for maintaining competitive credibility.

SOC 2 compliance demonstrates that an organization’s internal controls effectively safeguard customer information according to the selected Trust Services Criteria. This transparency builds confidence with clients, facilitates faster sales cycles, and can be used as a marketing differentiator in B2B industries.

Mimecast plays an important role in this process by helping organizations gather verifiable audit evidence. With centralized logging, encryption, and threat detection across communication systems, Mimecast provides the operational assurance and visibility auditors expect to see during SOC 2 examinations.

How Mimecast Supports ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Compliance

Mimecast’s AI-powered, API-enabled platform provides unified visibility into communication and collaboration environments, which are among the highest-risk vectors in any organization. The platform helps businesses align technical and administrative controls with the requirements of both ISO 27001 and SOC 2 while simplifying evidence collection and reporting.

Supporting ISO 27001 Controls

For ISO 27001, Mimecast supports Annex A controls through a combination of advanced email security, data governance, and information retention capabilities. These tools help enforce access restrictions, maintain secure data transfer channels, and detect potential threats before they compromise the organization’s ISMS. Mimecast’s real-time dashboards and compliance reporting functions also assist in meeting the documentation and monitoring obligations that auditors evaluate during certification.

Supporting SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria

In the context of SOC 2, Mimecast strengthens each Trust Services Criterion. Its layered security model protects against unauthorized access, ensuring system integrity and availability. Built-in encryption, archiving, and audit logging help organizations meet confidentiality and privacy requirements. Mimecast’s continuous monitoring provides auditable evidence of control performance across time, simplifying both Type I and Type II reporting processes.

Mimecast’s value extends beyond technology. Its approach to reducing human risk directly supports the intent behind both frameworks: creating a culture of accountability and awareness around data protection. By connecting technical controls with employee behavior analytics, Mimecast enables organizations to demonstrate not only compliance but active risk mitigation.

Additional Considerations: Cost, Timeline, and Effort

The time and cost associated with achieving compliance vary depending on scope, company size, and existing security maturity. ISO 27001 certification often requires a longer preparation period, typically six to twelve months, because it covers the entire organization. The cost can range from ten thousand to fifty thousand dollars or more, depending on the complexity of the ISMS and the certification body selected.

Mimecast’s platform reduces the manual workload often associated with these processes by automating monitoring, consolidating reports, and providing evidence trails for auditors. This efficiency helps organizations maintain compliance readiness year-round instead of scrambling during audit season.

Overlap Between ISO 27001 and SOC 2

Although ISO 27001 and SOC 2 originate from different institutions, their objectives are closely aligned. The AICPA has mapped an estimated 80 percent overlap between the two frameworks. Both emphasize data confidentiality, integrity, availability, and continuous improvement.

Pursuing both ISO 27001 certification and SOC 2 reporting can also offer strategic advantages. It signals to international customers that the organization maintains a mature, globally recognized ISMS, while providing North American clients with the auditor-verified transparency they expect. Together, they establish a comprehensive security narrative that builds trust with diverse audiences.

Why ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 Is Not a Competition

While discussions about ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 often frame the two as alternatives, the reality is that they complement each other. ISO 27001 provides the management system foundation, while SOC 2 offers external assurance through attestation. Pursuing both can create a layered approach to compliance that covers governance, operations, and customer assurance.

For many organizations, comparing ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 reveals how the two frameworks can operate in tandem rather than competition. When combined, they create a unified compliance strategy that bridges global expectations with regional assurance, giving businesses a stronger foundation for long-term cybersecurity governance.

Common Misconceptions

Several misconceptions surround ISO 27001 vs SOC 2, particularly among organizations approaching formal compliance for the first time. Understanding these misconceptions is essential to selecting the right framework, managing internal expectations, and allocating resources effectively.

For many organizations, comparing ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 reveals how the two frameworks can operate in tandem rather than competition. When combined, they create a unified compliance strategy that bridges global expectations with regional assurance, giving businesses a stronger foundation for long-term cybersecurity governance.

ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Are Interchangeable

One of the most common misunderstandings is that ISO 27001 and SOC 2 are functionally equivalent. While both aim to build trust in information security, they differ in focus and outcome. ISO 27001 provides a structured management framework that establishes how an organization identifies, manages, and improves security risks across all operations. SOC 2, by contrast, evaluates whether specific systems or services have adequate controls to protect customer data in accordance with defined Trust Services Criteria.

In practice, ISO 27001 certification demonstrates an organization’s ability to manage information security holistically. SOC 2 attestation demonstrates that selected controls for a particular service are operating effectively over time. Treating them as interchangeable can result in gaps, redundant work, or misaligned expectations with clients and auditors.

SOC 2 Is Easier to Achieve

Another misconception is that SOC 2 is inherently less demanding. While SOC 2 may appear simpler because it is more flexible, a Type II audit can require several months of evidence collection and continuous control validation. Auditors assess not only whether controls are designed properly but also whether they function consistently throughout the audit period.

For smaller organizations without established governance structures, maintaining operational consistency can be challenging. SOC 2’s flexibility means companies must define their own controls and map them to the Trust Services Criteria, a process that can require as much effort as ISO 27001 implementation. Mimecast helps reduce this burden through automated evidence collection and reporting tools that track control performance across time, simplifying the documentation process for both frameworks.

ISO 27001 Is Too Rigid for Smaller Businesses

ISO 27001 is sometimes viewed as suitable only for large enterprises due to its documentation requirements and organizational scope. However, the framework was intentionally designed to scale. The standard’s principle of proportionality allows smaller businesses to tailor controls according to their risk profile and operational size. Small and mid-sized companies often use ISO 27001 as a foundation to formalize security policies, improve risk visibility, and prepare for future certifications or audits.

You Only Need One Framework

Many organizations assume that they must choose between ISO 27001 and SOC 2, but the two frameworks are not mutually exclusive. Each addresses different dimensions of compliance and can complement the other. ISO 27001 is widely recognized by international regulators and clients, while SOC 2 reports are often requested by U.S.-based customers and business partners.

Organizations that operate globally or serve enterprise clients in multiple regions often pursue both frameworks. Doing so demonstrates operational maturity, enhances customer confidence, and streamlines vendor onboarding processes.

Certification or Attestation Guarantees Security

A frequent but critical misconception is that certification or attestation automatically equates to security. Compliance frameworks evaluate whether an organization has implemented appropriate controls and processes, but they cannot guarantee the absence of future incidents. Threats evolve continuously, and even certified organizations can experience breaches if controls are not maintained or adapted over time.

Compliance Alone Prevents Human Error

While frameworks like ISO 27001 and SOC 2 strengthen governance, they do not eliminate human risk. Employees remain the first line of defense and, often, the most common source of security incidents through phishing, misconfiguration, or mishandling of sensitive data. Human error cannot be addressed solely by policy; it requires active awareness and reinforcement.

Mimecast’s platform extends compliance beyond documentation by embedding human risk management into everyday workflows. It detects behavioral anomalies, provides awareness training, and encourages responsible communication practices. This integration ensures that compliance frameworks are supported by an informed, security-conscious workforce.

Conclusion

Both ISO 27001 and SOC 2 are proven methods for demonstrating strong information security practices. ISO 27001 provides a structured, internationally recognized management system for securing information across the enterprise, while SOC 2 offers independent assurance of how effectively a company’s controls protect data over time. Together, they form the foundation of a resilient security posture and a trusted reputation in the marketplace.

Explore how Mimecast can help your organization enhance cybersecurity governance, maintain consistent control performance, and support a culture where every employee works protected.