Mimecast Incydr and Cyberhaven Data Detection and Response are both cloud-based data protection solutions that help security teams detect, investigate and respond to insider threats. Mimecast Incydr can take action to protect data and stop exfiltration.
Cyberhaven relies heavily on policy-based methods that add significant administrative burden to security teams. Incydr uses an AI-enabled prioritization model to uncover potential exfiltration risks that may have gone unnoticed by rules-based methods.
Unlike Cyberhaven, Incydr both blocks insider activity and responds with timely security trainings, which can reduce 36% of insider activity within 4 months.
Unlike Cyberhaven, Incydr is an API-first platform. With 30+ integrations with leaders like CrowdStrike, Tines, Workday, Slack, Okta, Splunk, SumoLogic and Rapid7, it ensures seamless security team workflows.
Here’s a snapshot of how exactly Incydr’s key capabilities compare to Cyberhaven.
| Mimecast Incydr | Cyberhaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid Deployment and Ease of Use | ||
| Policy creation & management | AI-enabled prioritization model detects risks out-of-the-box with no configuration | Requires you to set up policies and determine what events are risky on your own |
| Corrective Response Controls | ||
| Real-time user blocking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Insider threat remediation | Case management and integrated containment controls | Requires an outside tool to track notes and share evidence |
| User correction | Triggered video lessons and pop-ups provide in-the-moment education-based controls | Pop-ups |
| Impact on User Systems | ||
| Endpoint disruption | Typically less than 1% usage | Testers complain of device impact |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Number of integrations | 30+ integrations across SIEM, EDR, IAM and SOAR to provide seamless interoperability | Not identified |
| Resources & Guidance | ||
| Communications templates | ✓ | -- |
| Program RACI examples | ✓ | -- |
| Dedicated CSM | ✓ | -- |
