Frequently Asked Questions
How does Mimecast's insider risk management compare to Proofpoint's?
Proofpoint's insider risk story is built on a policy-first approach that requires manual setup and significant admin overhead and tuning before delivering value. Mimecast Incydr is purpose-built: no policies required, detected events prioritised from day one, and a wide range of adaptive controls from education to blocking that can be deployed for high-risk scenarios. A more open platform offers flexibility with 30+ native integrations vs Proofpoint ITM's <10.
How disruptive is switching from Proofpoint to Mimecast email security?
Less than you think. Deploy Mimecast API-based behind Proofpoint in hours —no MX changes, no disruption. Run side-by-side for 30–60 days. When you’re ready to switch we make it seamless.
Is Proofpoint's Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) really that much better?
TAP is capable, but advanced detection doesn't guarantee better outcomes. Mimecast's multi-layered detection covers sandboxing, deep URL inspection, and behavioural AI. Available via MX, API, or both — same engine, same protection. Run a 30-day side-by-side using your own data and let the results decide.
We just renewed Proofpoint IRM. Is it worth exploring Mimecast Incydr now?
Yes, now is the right time to prove the value of better visibility and easier long-term management. Deploy Incydr alongside your existing Proofpoint setup today, and start seeing insider risk you’re missing within just a few days of a 30-day Incydr POV. Build a business case to make the switch.
Does Mimecast work alongside our existing security stack?
Yes — Mimecast is built for open, interconnected security ecosystems. 350+ integrations with CrowdStrike, Microsoft, Netskope, Splunk, and SIEM/SOAR tools. Incydr adds 30+ purpose-built integrations with an interconnected mindset that eliminates data silos. Proofpoint's ITM has 12 integrations designed to keep you inside their ecosystem.