Navigating AI Risk: What Boards & Security Leaders Must Act On Now
Wichtige Punkte
- Why shadow AI is a board-level governance signal, not just an IT problem — and what "are you ready for thousands of new insiders?" really means for risk exposure.
- How leading regulatory frameworks (APRA CPS 230, EU AI Act, SR 26-2, NIST AI) are converging on the same governance expectations.
- A 90-day action playbook boards and security leaders can use to close the gap between AI adoption pressure and governance readiness.
Employees are adopting AI faster than boards can govern it. Shadow AI isn't a hypothetical — it's already inside your organization, and as Mark Arapovic puts it, "the honest answer is: we don't know" how much data has already moved through unsanctioned tools. That's not a comfortable place for a board to be.
In this session, Mark Arapovic (Insider Sales Engineering Specialist, APAC) and John Taylor (Field CTO, APAC) unpack why shadow AI is a canary in a coal mine for governance readiness — and why speed isn't the problem, it's governance. They walk through the regulatory landscape boards can't ignore (APRA CPS 230, the EU AI Act, SR 26-2, NIST AI framework), real breach examples tied to ungoverned AI use, and a 90-day playbook security leaders can act on immediately.