Mimecast® Named in ‘Outsourcing email archiving: 2009’ report by leading analyst firm
Posted on 19 May 2009
Increase in companies moving from in-house to outsourced email archiving
May 18th 2009, London and Boston, MA: Mimecast has been included in the list of outsourced email archiving service providers in the Gartner “Outsourcing E-Mail Archiving: 2Q09 Update” by Adam W. Couture, on April 27th 2009. The report examines the benefits and capabilities of today's hosted e-mail archiving solutions and profiles key service providers in this market.
According to the Gartner report, “Organizations should consider using service providers to help them quickly implement interim or permanent solutions without heavy upfront investments in technology or internal expertise. Consider using a service provider for not just archiving, but also for email continuity, virus protection and spam filtering.”
Given the increase in email volumes and sizes of attachments, the Gartner report also highlights, “For organizations looking to capture and save everything, with limited or no mailbox management requirements, a hosted solution may be more cost-effective than an in-house solution. Increased use of on-site appliances for bandwidth and encryption management, plus the addition of attachment management and attractive pricing have made hosted solutions much more competitive with in-house solutions.”
Mimecast CEO Peter Bauer comments, “We are pleased to be included in this Gartner report. Mimecast uniquely offers organizations an outsourced option to in-house email management that covers all the bases – email archiving, continuity and security. We’ve seen rapid movement in this market as customers wish to acquire technology that integrates outsourced email archiving within an overall email management framework. This is reflected in Mimecast’s fast growing market share in the outsourced email archiving market.”
Adding, “Outsourced solutions such as Mimecast alleviate the complexity and resource intensiveness of in-house archiving, and can significantly reduce the capital and ongoing running costs.”
What Next?
Archive
- August 2010 (3)
- July 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (4)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (2)
- March 2010 (5)
- February 2010 (4)
- January 2010 (1)
- December 2009 (1)
- November 2009 (1)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (4)
- July 2009 (2)
- June 2009 (2)
- May 2009 (3)
- April 2009 (4)
- March 2009 (6)
- February 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (4)
- December 2008 (2)
- November 2008 (2)
- October 2008 (5)
- September 2008 (3)
- August 2008 (3)
- July 2008 (3)
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (1)
- March 2008 (4)
- February 2008 (1)
- December 2007 (1)
- November 2007 (1)
- October 2007 (3)
- September 2007 (1)